The 1993 Precedent · Study resolution

Asking the church to study, as it has before

A draft resolution to the 2028 General Assembly asking for a study committee, and a one-page case for possible sponsors.

Status

These are working drafts prepared with an AI research assistant. They have not been submitted and have no sponsors yet. Standing Rule 16 lets a district assembly, a district resolutions committee, or any five or more members of the General Assembly present a resolution, and it must reach the General Secretary by 1 December 2027. Word copies: draft resolution · one-page case.

The one-page case

The ask. A resolution to the 2028 General Assembly asking the Board of General Superintendents to convene a representative study committee on pastoral guidance concerning human sexuality. The committee would report to the next Assembly. The resolution changes nothing in the Manual and presumes no outcome.

The church has done this before.

In both cases the church neither drifted nor forced a floor fight. It asked its scholars and pastors to study and report, and then it decided.

The question is already before the church. Paragraph 31 says the call to sexual purity is “costly,” and that living it out in congregations “is complex and must be navigated with care, humility, courage, and discernment.” District boards, credentials boards and pastors face real cases now, often without guidance. A 2015 doctoral study of Nazarene pastors found the question “touched the lives of all the participants,” and that almost none were reaching out to gay and lesbian people.

What this resolution is not. It is not a proposal to change paragraph 31. It does not ask anyone to endorse a view. A delegate who holds the church’s present teaching can support it, just as the church studied divorce in 1964 and 1989 while still holding its teaching on marriage. Study under the Board’s authority is how a holiness church does careful thinking together.

What sponsorship takes.

For more. The 1991 committee paper, the 1993 report and a longer analysis are available on request.

Sources: Herald of Holiness, July 19, 1972, 16–18; Report of the Divorce and the Ministry Study Committee to the 23rd General Assembly, 1993, 200–206; Journal of the Thirtieth General Assembly, 2023, 14–15, 207; Manual 2023, ¶¶31, 912; R. G. Watson, Regent University PhD dissertation, 2015, 310–311.

The draft resolution

Working draft for prospective sponsors. The General Secretary assigns the resolution number. Submit by 1 December 2027 (General Assembly Standing Rule 16e, Manual ¶912).

[Number]—Study Committee on Pastoral Guidance Concerning Human Sexuality

Presented by: [District Assembly or District Resolutions Committee], or [names of five or more members of the General Assembly] (Standing Rule 16).

Type: Non-Manual item. It proposes no change to the text of the Manual.

Entity responsible for carrying it out: The Board of General Superintendents (Standing Rule 16f).

RESOLVED, that the Board of General Superintendents convene a committee, representing the diversity of the denomination by region, lay and clergy, and including biblical scholars, theologians, pastors and district leaders, to study:

  1. the pastoral care of members, families and congregations affected by same-sex attraction;
  2. the guidance given to District Advisory Boards and District Ministerial Credentials Boards in such cases; and
  3. the scriptural and theological foundations of paragraph 31 of the Covenant of Christian Conduct, including the method the church has used in comparable questions of marriage and membership;

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the committee hear from pastors, district superintendents, and members and families directly affected;

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the committee’s study neither presume nor preclude any recommendation, and that nothing in this resolution alters the Manual or the Covenant of Christian Conduct while the study is under way;

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the committee report its findings, with any recommendations or resolutions, to the Board of General Superintendents, who shall report to the next General Assembly.

COST ESTIMATE (required by General Assembly Standing Rule 16c; Manual ¶912)

Total cost: about 35,000 USD, using the same per-person figures as JUD-814 (2023).

Per-person cost of one three-day physical meeting:

Item Cost
Airfare $800
Lodging (5 nights × $125) $625
Meals and support (3 days × $100) $300
Contingency $50
Total per person $1,775

With ten members, a physical meeting costs about $17,750. Two physical meetings during the quadrennium, with all other meetings by video conference, would cost about $35,500.

RATIONALE

The church has twice studied a question of marriage and membership before changing its practice.

In both cases the church did not change its practice by drift or by floor debate alone. It asked its scholars and pastors to study the question and report.

Paragraph 31 itself recognizes the weight of the present question. It acknowledges that “the implication of this call to sexual purity is costly,” and that “the faithful outworking of these statements as congregations is complex and must be navigated with care, humility, courage, and discernment.” A study committee is the church’s established way of giving districts and pastors that kind of careful guidance. The study would be conducted under the Board’s authority and would report to the Assembly. Adopting it commits the church to study, not to any outcome.